News RSS Feed


Foie gras could be banned in ground-breaking move

9:38am Tuesday 23rd January 2007

comment Comments (124)   Have your say »


YORK could become one of the first cities in the world to ban the food delicacy foie gras, if councillors back a pioneering motion later this week.

City of York councillors will be asked to pass a motion calling on shops and restaurants to stop selling the dish on cruelty grounds.

The motion, tabled by Labour councillor Paul Blanchard, has received international backing from animal rights groups, and Chicago, where its sale is already banned.

Foie gras is the liver of a duck or goose that has been fattened by force-feeding. Protestors claim it is cruel to animals. Its production is already banned in Britain, but there is no law against its sale or consumption.

Coun Blanchard said: "It is a brutal practice, the production of which has rightly been outlawed in Britain. But we are still one of the biggest importers of foie gras from France, and until that stops, the torture of these birds is on all our consciences."

Last year, foie gras was banned in Chicago after a groundbreaking campaign.

Joe Moore, Alderman of the 49th Ward of Chicago, said: "If the City of York Council passes this motion, it will make a profound moral statement against cruelty, and send a powerful message that it upholds the values of a civilised and humane society."

According to Compassion In World Farming, the ducks and geese have a pipe forced down their necks, pumping food into them up to three times a day.

By the time they are slaughtered, their livers will have swollen to about ten times their normal size. They can suffer from internal bleeding and have problems walking and breathing, the charity says.

Marie-Claire Macintosh, of the charity, said: "We applaud the City of York Council in its pioneering efforts to get foie gras banned on cruelty grounds. The method to produce this delicacy' is brutal and inherently cruel and has no place in a civilised society."

Coun Blanchard's motion calls the council to declare "this intolerably cruel and painful practice is unnecessary and should end."

The motion has the backing of other Labour councillors, and York Green Party. It urges the city to "do as much as reasonably possible to discourage or prohibit the sale of foie gras within the authority area".

Coun Blanchard, who wants a free vote on the issue, said: "I have been asked why I am trying to address this issue when we are confronted with so many more pressing issues like crime and transport.

"I also readily accept there is much injustice afflicted upon humans that far outweigh cruelty to animals.

"However, that there are greater wrongs in the world should not require us to turn a blind eye to other cruelties when they are exposed."


Your Say YourYork Press

Marvin, says...
9:46am Tue 23 Jan 07

Absolutely. This type of monstrosity has no place in a civilised society. It is an evil disgusting industry + you have to be concerned about the sanity of anyone who works in that vile industry.

Money wasters, says...
10:04am Tue 23 Jan 07

I can't believe this! while I agree that this is a cruel industry, what on earth has it got to do with the council if people chose to eat or serve up this food, it's called freedome of choice. York council, get a grip of yourselves and do what you were put in post to do, look after the resident's needs not wasting time and money making more and more ridiculous pointless decisions

Marvin, says...
10:22am Tue 23 Jan 07

Its called morals. You could say the same about a lot of things that councils or governments decide to do, such as making murder, rape or theft illegal in the case of the latter. Someone somewhere has to make decisions and I applaud the council for once.

Sarah, says...
10:27am Tue 23 Jan 07

By bringing this cruel practice to the public's attention, York Council is giving people the choice to do the right thing. Cruelty like this goes unchallenged too often in modern society!

Dave, says...
10:30am Tue 23 Jan 07

Well said Sarah, I doubt the public are even aware of the horrific truth behind this disgusting product.

C, says...
10:31am Tue 23 Jan 07

I had no idea this process took place, its absolutely disgusting - i will never buy or eat it again !

Psi, says...
10:40am Tue 23 Jan 07

I agree totally that Councils, as a first tier of government, need to look at items like this and make an informed decision.

What may be important to remember is if you go down this route then you have to have a consistent approach. North Yorkshire has the highest cruelty rate on pets by owners than any other county, is something going to be done about that? Do we ban veal, perhaps. What about Grouse and Pheasant which are maimed and wounded in the shoot.

I would say yes to a proven systematic approach but don't pick and choose what you are going to legislate about to make a noame for yourself or put the City on the map. This will cause more discontent and prove a sham for those involved.

Rubbish, says...
10:48am Tue 23 Jan 07

Pie in the sky, how do they expect to be able to stop supermarkets selling it?
I don't think they can.

Tom, says...
10:53am Tue 23 Jan 07

Absolutely ridiculous. Does this mean I'll have to go and eat in Leeds if I want foie gras? That'll help the York economy!

The local council has no right interfering like this - if people don't want to eat foie gras in a restaurant they don't have to - no-one is force-feeding it to them.

Marvin, says...
10:53am Tue 23 Jan 07

I think veal crates were banned weren't they? As for shooting grouse and pheasants, pity the idiots who think this is fun haven't got better things to do with their time rather than pit their wits against beautiful, harmless birds. Although in many cases I guess they are trying to outwit creatures with a considerably superior intelligence.

Jo, says...
10:57am Tue 23 Jan 07

if people knew how it was made it wouldnt need to be banned cos anyone with any degree of conscience wouldnt eat it. those who do should be given a supervision order.

Julie, says...
11:01am Tue 23 Jan 07

The York Council has no powers to act independently on this, even assuming that there were some farms producing Foie Gras in the area.
If he wants to ban restuarants and shops from selling it, then he might at least check whether any currently do. Not exactly the staple diet of most York residents - New Labour lovies excepted of course.
But the Council will it seems be discussing its record in providing public services, the threat to our local health services and the City's housing problems - so we must have at least some sensible Councillors .

hungry, says...
11:01am Tue 23 Jan 07

When are they gonna ban lamb, pork, beef, venison, veal, and even chicken for that matter. Its all the same thing, animals killed for food. People should have a choice if they want to eat it or not.

Mary T., says...
11:05am Tue 23 Jan 07

its the cruelty aspect. if you cannot see that force-feeding ducks and geese til their livers burst is unneccessary and cruel then you have no place in a civilised society. as you rightly say its not the staple diet of most people, probably something eaten by the toffs most of which are pig ignorant and cannot read anyway so haven't a clue how it gets on their plates.

Bob, says...
11:09am Tue 23 Jan 07

Foie gras is served in York retaurants. The Lime House, Middlethorpe Hall, and the Blue Bicycle all serve it. My only problem with the ban is that it's delicious.

bob, says...
11:16am Tue 23 Jan 07

ban sale of vegetables! the cruelty they experience to be fattened up then chopped down at their prime.

Marvin, says...
11:24am Tue 23 Jan 07

you are an idiot bob, a complete and utter imbecile. you're one of those thoroughly irritating people who thinks they're funny but they're not.

J, says...
11:27am Tue 23 Jan 07

it upholds the values of a civilised and humane society."


Haha has he been in out on a Friday in York? Me thinks the council has more serious matters to be dealing with than Foie Gras.

md, says...
11:28am Tue 23 Jan 07

its the cruelty aspect. if you cannot see that force-feeding ducks and geese til their livers burst is unneccessary and cruel then you have no place in a civilised society

SO basically it is only cruel if they are fed to bursting point, but the act of killing cows, sheep etc. with a single bullet is ok, or slaughtering chickens with a snap? Foie gras is not something I'd eat, but if others wish to it is their choice. If you start banning one thing because it is cruel then you have to ban all meat as, at the end of the day, all animals die to create this. BTW I am a meat eater.

Cllr Paul Blanchard, says...
11:30am Tue 23 Jan 07

"Money wasters" has it wrong. The torture of animals is not a matter of personal choice. I am not trying to ban steak or hamburgers here. To produce foie gras animals are tortured. Wrong is wrong.

There is nothing wrong with taking a stand on the issues you care about. Like "C" says, they didn't even know about this cruel practice, and so the campaign is already doing some good in terms of raising awareness of this cruel practice.

"PSI" says why don't we try to ban veal et al. He has a point, but politics is the art of the possible, and if you try to campaign on too many issues at once you end up weakening your whole message and then nothing gets done. Everyone has to start somewhere, and this is a good start as far as I am concerned. As for “making a name for myself” – well, as you can see, with an issue like this, it is likely to turn as many voters off me as it will make them like me. It's quite simple really - you campaign on issues like this because you feel passionate about it, and for no other reason. This is a democracy. My job is to highlight an issue and then the public then debates them. I am not imposing the ban on anyone, I am only suggesting one and asking what people think.

"Rubbish" questions whether you can actually stop supermarkets selling it. Of course you can. The law on this at the moment is stupid anyway - we can't make foie gras in the UK as it's too cruel, and yet by allowing it to be sold, we create demand for it, and thus animals still end up suffering, albeit in other countries. It’s inconsistent. We should have a blanket ban on the sale of foie gras to put the law back on the right track. We are still one of the biggest importers of foie gras from France, and until that stops, the torture of these birds is on all our consciences. The demand creates the supply.

“Tom” says it will not help the York economy if he has to travel to Leeds to eat it. Well, that argument simply ignores the complete cruelty to the animals – should they suffer intolerably, simply to provide an extra option on the menu of a few exclusive restaurants in York?

“Julie” says that foie gras is “not exactly the staple diet of most York residents” and she is right. In politics, you have to stick up for what you believe in and show leadership on the issues you care about. We need to bring this sickening practice to the attention of everyone. That's what I am doing here, and I see nothing wrong with that. The next stage of the campaign is to persuade the Government to ban the sale of foie gras throughout the UK. But until then, we’re sending out the message: York does not tolerate cruelty to animals.

I have been asked why I am trying to address this issue when we are confronted with so many more pressing issues like crime and transport. I also readily accept that there is much injustice afflicted upon humans that far outweigh cruelty to animals. However, that there are greater wrongs in the world should not require us to turn a blind eye to other cruelties when they are exposed. Justice is not a finite commodity, and nor is kindness. Where we find wrongs done to animals, it’s no excuse to say that more important wrongs are done to humans, so let’s ignore it. As I said eralier, if something is wrong, it’s wrong.

Chris, says...
11:31am Tue 23 Jan 07

The problem with this is where do you draw the line.
Battery Chickens are just as badly treated but a ban on cheap chicken would cause many problems to people who couldnt afford the free range stuff. I think if you are going to ban one thing on cruelty grounds you have to go the whole way.
To be honest there's more important things going on that concern me more than people eating fois gras.
And unfortunately it is delicious.

John, says...
11:52am Tue 23 Jan 07

What is wrong with shooting pheasants and Grouse to Eat ?
I'ts certainly less cruel than large scale production and closer to our original 'hunter gatherer' roots.
Marvin if only everyone was lucky enough to be able to choose which industry to be in - some people due to economic reasons can't so don't question peoples sanity or call people idiots - you sound quite idiotic to me.

David, says...
12:05pm Tue 23 Jan 07

I haven't eaten foie gras since I learned how it's produced.
That said, it's not the council's job to tell us what we can or can't eat.

jay, says...
12:11pm Tue 23 Jan 07

I don't care if they ban foie gras. It's a food that LOOKS like cat food, smells worse, and causes unimaginable cruelty to ducks/geese to produce it. It doesn't even taste very good and it's terribly unhealthy.

The EU talks a good game about being civilised but why they haven't banned foie gras production/sales is beyond me. If we're going to pretend to be more moral than the rest of the world perhaps we should start holding ourselves to a higher standard.

Tm, says...
12:20pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Tom wrote:
Absolutely ridiculous. Does this mean I'll have to go and eat in Leeds if I want foie gras? That'll help the York economy! The local council has no right interfering like this - if people don't want to eat foie gras in a restaurant they don't have to - no-one is force-feeding it to them.
No but the restauant will still have the fois gras in stock incase someone wants to, which means the cruelty is still going on, i have only tried fois gras once, i did afterwards find out what it was and i did enjoy it it was lovely, but i would not go out of my way to find some to eat as i think it is horrific what happens to the birds, I am certainly not a veggie, most of my diet is meat but i do believe in killing an animal humaely!apparently the liver actually bursts while the bird is still alive...food for thought.

Counter, says...
12:21pm Tue 23 Jan 07

More frickin ignorance.

Not all foie gras is produced in this way - there are 'humane' methods to make this product which do not involve force-feeding.

This is just an excuse for meat-eaters to feel a little less bad about themselves. It's denial of the fact that like it or not, a lot of our meat is produced in ways that we would feel are inhumane or cruel. Especially bacon, the most popular.

Marvin, says...
12:26pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Don't get me wrong md, I certainly don't support slaughtering lambs or chickens either! However, even though I disagree with the practice, I can see that the cruelty involved in foie gras production is nothing short of brutal.
Interesting to see that J and Chris think there are 'more important issues' than the torture of animals. How about one of you volunteer to have a pipe stuck down your throat and be force fed until your livers burst and then make your point? How about doing this in Parliament Square on a Saturday afternoon so all can see? Don't fancy it? Thought not.

Paul Blanchard you are a hero and good luck with this. You have my vote and my family's votes guaranteed in May.

J, says...
12:35pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Despite his long reply He still hasn't clarified under which laws he has the power to stop this and uses the very weak and childish arguement that the current law is stupid. Whilst he may well disagree with the law he appears to be making statements that are un-enforcable without a legislative change which is not the same as York saying it is going to ban the product.



Tm, says...
12:36pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Counter wrote:
More frickin ignorance. Not all foie gras is produced in this way - there are 'humane' methods to make this product which do not involve force-feeding. This is just an excuse for meat-eaters to feel a little less bad about themselves. It's denial of the fact that like it or not, a lot of our meat is produced in ways that we would feel are inhumane or cruel. Especially bacon, the most popular.
Exactly so this is why they are trying to make people aware of it and to get it in place, i am a meat eater but i do not eat things that i believe to have been made by treating animals inhumanely, it is up to people who like urself supposedly know how to bring it our attention, i would never stop eating meat because an animal is killed for it, e.g. a shot to the head, because its natural, its what people have done throughout history but if it is done cruelly then i disagree with it

yorkie, says...
12:37pm Tue 23 Jan 07

how do you qualify to be the one(s)to determine which animals should die and how they should be killed? the most inhumane is rats, the poison slowly destroys their internal organs over a number of days before dying! but this is generally acceptable, i would never be so arrogant as to think i could choose one species over another.

OR

is this another long game have labour found a 3 or 4 year old xmas party menu for the liberals containing foie gras and will 'expose' them in due course.

Marvin, says...
12:40pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Unless you are some legal expert 'J' I would tend to think Cllr Blanchard has done a bit more research into this than you have?

From an ethical, rather than a legal viewpoint, how can we sell something in this country that we have deemed is too cruel to produce ourselves? Typical case of letting someone do our dirty work for us.

steve h, says...
12:41pm Tue 23 Jan 07

crap sports facilities,pathetic run down swimming baths,overpriced car parking, overbearing arrogant lib dem councillors who don t give a **** about the residents but we ve nipped the foie gras problem in the bud so i consider my council tax well spent.

Joe, says...
12:46pm Tue 23 Jan 07

i'd say that pain, suffering and torture are a little more important than silly sports facilities or swimming pools or whether its £2 or £3 to park your wretched car.

Rubbish, says...
12:49pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Posted by: Rubbish on 10:48am today
Pie in the sky, how do they expect to be able to stop supermarkets selling it?
I don't think they can.

Posted by: J on 12:35pm today
Despite his long reply He still hasn't clarified under which laws he has the power to stop this and uses the very weak and childish arguement that the current law is stupid. Whilst he may well disagree with the law he appears to be making statements that are un-enforcable without a legislative change which is not the same as York saying it is going to ban the product.
Despite his long reply He still hasn't clarified under which laws he has the power to stop this and uses the very weak and childish arguement that the current law is stupid. Whilst he may well disagree with the law he appears to be making statements that are un-enforcable without a legislative change which is not the same as York saying it is going to ban the product.

Well Coun Blanchard, under what legislation are you going to ban it, please. Truth is, you can't and the whole story is attention seeking (diverting?) hot air.

me, says...
12:52pm Tue 23 Jan 07

I'd prefer they banned **** like macdonalds or burger king then fois gras.

Both of those two have been responsible for more animal cruelty and deforestation then some posh resteraunt who wants to serve some silly dish.

Corrupt local govenment, says...
12:54pm Tue 23 Jan 07

C wrote:
I had no idea this process took place, its absolutely disgusting - i will never buy or eat it again !
You are an idiot if you don’t know what you are eating.

sr, says...
1:00pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Foi Gras is lovely. I eat it all the time when in France. The council has no right to interfere with our eating habits apart from the health and safety aspect. Just another **** pc and big brother is watching you view. Let us get on with what we have a choice of. Council, mind your own business!!!

Rubbish, says...
1:00pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Posted by: Marvin on 12:40pm today
Unless you are some legal expert 'J' I would tend to think Cllr Blanchard has done a bit more research into this than you have?

Like to bet? Can somebody enlighten us as to under which leglislation fois gras can be banned, please?

Money wasters, says...
1:03pm Tue 23 Jan 07

steve h wrote:
crap sports facilities,pathetic run down swimming baths,overpriced car parking, overbearing arrogant lib dem councillors who don t give a **** about the residents but we ve nipped the foie gras problem in the bud so i consider my council tax well spent.
Nail on the head Steve, well said!

Pte Frazer, says...
1:05pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Ever since they let peasants into the town hall we have been doomed.

The Scientist, says...
1:10pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Most foie gras is produced in a brutal manner to supply a high demand, but I can't see how it's any worse than the treatment of battery hens though, and that's something that goes on in this country and could be banned. The ultimate choice lies with the consumer; everyone can help in influencing food production by getting off their backsides and making a difference with their own actions as consumers.
PS - foie gras is lovely though.

DavidJ, says...
1:10pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Typical labour nothing changes spin.

Cllr Blanchard cannot ban the sale of fois gras or anything else for that matter. If this is the best we have to hope for as a replacement for our current brain dead council then god help us.

Big mistake for labour - with all the real problems the city has is this really the best headline Clown Blanchard and his team could come up with!!

Ettienne, says...
1:53pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Whilst they're at it, why don't they try to ban halal or kosher meat? Do uou know how those animals are killed? Not very nice having your throat cut and bleeding to death. Oh, but such a ban would be seen as racist wouldn't it. Mustn't have that.

DavidJ, says...
2:09pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Good point Ettienne - Our interfering but ineffective labour lot are unlikely to do anything that might upset some of their core voters. Any discussion around issues like that would bring the loony left mafia down on you quicker than you could say double standards gerrymandering

Champagne Socialist, says...
2:14pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Taste of things to come I'm afraid. Labour likes banning things and with only a few months to go before the smoking ban they will be already on the lookout for ideas of what to ban next. Can I suggest they ban stealth taxes or maybe just Gordon Brown in general!

yorkie, says...
2:20pm Tue 23 Jan 07

yeh well said ettienne, i'd back you on that one, or do labour have a selective policy covering this, we know you are reading so answer blanchard.

lynne, says...
2:41pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Bonjour Ms Blanchard -Thanks for the joke ( re banning the sale of foie gras ) just remembered why I left York for the Sth of France !!! I could not park in the city , re-cycling was non-existant , dirty streets , anti-social behaviuor on the rise ,increasing council tax bills , failing social care ,closure of elderly accomodation units , in all not much to shout about . But you believe that banning a product will benefit York ? You are a local councillor who should be spending your time and the councils money on improving the city - please tell us how many of the people that voted for you have asked you to put this ban into place.
Get off your hobby horse and work for a living .

Marvin, says...
3:06pm Tue 23 Jan 07

How some of you sleep at night knowing the suffering and misery needed to feed your fat selfish bellies is beyond me. I would personally like to ram food down your throats with a pipe til your livers burst, as its probably the only way to teach the ignorant. But then again I imagine some of you stick enough food down your gullets anyway without even needing pipes or brutality.

A typical selfish attitude, don't care about misery and pain, just as long as you get your grub. Some of you posting on here should be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves.

Beth, says...
3:29pm Tue 23 Jan 07

So are they going to ban Danish bacon next?
They treat their pigs a lot worse then veal calves and use farming practises banned in this country, which is why the bacon is so cheap.
The trouble is that applies to most imported and cheap meat, so where does it end?

T, says...
3:34pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Has anyone noticed how we are all arguing about a delicassy that we take forgranted we can afford and the advertisement in the middle of the page is about starving people who can hardly afford to stay alive...hmm either The Press is incredibly insensitive or they are taking the mickey out of everyone they know will write on here demanding their right to eat whatever they want.

richard, says...
4:03pm Tue 23 Jan 07

To echo what a lot of people have already said. Under what law or legislation does this so called moral watchdog think they can ban Fois Gras? Who is this councillor to tell us what we can or cannot eat. Should or Should not eat. Do I force people to eat ribeye steaks just because i love them. Or force people not to eat celery purely because i think it is disgusting. Yes, Fois Gras maybe a little outdated manufacturing process. But bear inmind that all meat we eat is farmed. This means we force animals to fatten and mature before they natually would.

As already has been mentioned. Does the council of York have nothing better to spend money on in York. What about how dirty or city is? What about the poor road conditions? What about the lack of investment in bringing jobs to the city(other than call centre or tourism).

Surely York Council and any of its representatives should get their own house in order before attempting to tell law abiding tax payers what we should eat. I agree with one comment previously...ban Mcdonalds or Burgerking which are damaging humans health. Whats more important. Health of a duck or a human?

I think i may follow Lynn and move to France. York city council are being to irritate me no end and no doubt they'll be putting up the council tax again this year.

Vegetarian, says...
4:10pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Why do you all want to kill animals anyhow? You can obtain all the necessary nutrients by other more humane methods.

meat lover, says...
4:16pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
Why do you all want to kill animals anyhow? You can obtain all the necessary nutrients by other more humane methods.
do you want to share my nice bacon sarnie....lovely bit of pig.

dry cured too lurvlyyyyy.

meat eater, says...
4:20pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
Why do you all want to kill animals anyhow? You can obtain all the necessary nutrients by other more humane methods.
Because they taste nice and its called the food chain. Its a natural part of being alive. When I'm lower down the food chain than, cows, pigs, lambs, chickens, deer and panda i will stop eating them.

richard, says...
4:26pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
Why do you all want to kill animals anyhow? You can obtain all the necessary nutrients by other more humane methods.
Rubbish! We eat meat because we can. DO NOT tell others what they can and cannot eat. Do I suggest all vegetarians should give up lentils?? I think not. Accept our values! because we couldn't care less about yours

richard, says...
4:29pm Tue 23 Jan 07

incidently if we're at the top of the food chain, why can't we eat panda and gorilla?

Joyce, says...
4:31pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Money wasters wrote:
steve h wrote: crap sports facilities,pathetic run down swimming baths,overpriced car parking, overbearing arrogant lib dem councillors who don t give a **** about the residents but we ve nipped the foie gras problem in the bud so i consider my council tax well spent.
Nail on the head Steve, well said!
Blanchard is a member of the Labour opposition on the Council.
Kick Labour off the Council altogether in May if you don't want them to waste your money.

Allan Ashworth, says...
4:33pm Tue 23 Jan 07

"Money Waster" is not living in the real world. Should we all not be in favour of banning cruelty - and this one is so easy to do.

ALD, says...
4:36pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Regardless of the merits or otherwise of foie gras I am certain that the Council Chamber is not the place to discuss this. Cllr Blanchard has the right to his opinion but his and other Councillor's time could and should be better spent in addressing mor pressing issues such as the poorer Council Tax settlement from the Government and the better use of available resources for the benefit of the older members of the City and other in need of social security services.

Donald Trump, says...
4:40pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Gorilla is tough (unless you eat the baby) and Panda is a bit too fatty for me (best if you cook it slowly with a Osprey egg up its arse.

Rambler, says...
4:53pm Tue 23 Jan 07

I dont believe the local government is banning yet another food group, if people were that appaled the resteraunts would make no profit from selling it. This should be a matter of personal choice, most people are aware on how this is made and on the same point they are aware that it is one of the best kinds of liver to be used in many products.

meat lover, says...
4:56pm Tue 23 Jan 07

ive never had gorilla,would like to try some,doubt tescos will have them.

badgers nice,b astards to find though...and i just love a bit of beaver...spit roasted is best

Vegetarian, says...
4:57pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Few of you macho meat eaters would have the guts to kill the animals yourself. Thank your lucky stars for Tesco's and the little red meaningless packages that ease your consciences.
Meat means suffering.
Meat means Murder.
Well done York Council!

Charlie Croaker, says...
5:03pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Meat means “the flesh of an animal that is considered edible, especially a mammal or bird”

Since Little Mr Tony Bliar took away all our guns we have to thank Tesco’s for providing us with so much choice. BTW meat lover the rare animals are in the “Tesco’s Finest” isle. Very reasonable prices too. Split roast beaver mmmmm,

Vegetarian, says...
5:09pm Tue 23 Jan 07

From Right Charlie;

Meat means “the flesh of an animal that is considered edible, especially a mammal or bird”


Well I never! We didn't know that did we kids?

meat lover, says...
5:11pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
Few of you macho meat eaters would have the guts to kill the animals yourself. Thank your lucky stars for Tesco's and the little red meaningless packages that ease your consciences. Meat means suffering. Meat means Murder. Well done York Council!
so why do we have canine teeth then?not to chew on lentils thats for sure.

black pudding.....lovely.....rare steak dripping in blood...yum....the smell of piggy sizzling in the pan...divine.
meat is murder....what you going to do about it??????

Money wasters, says...
5:12pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Once had Guinea Pig in Peru, was lovely, bit rare though, bit of blood left on the plate.

Vegetarian, says...
5:20pm Tue 23 Jan 07

what you going to do about it??????


1)Not get wound up by imbeciles
2)Refuse to eat any type of meat
3)Not get mad cow disease like Yoooooooo!

Geoff, says...
5:23pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Just what has foie gras got to do with the running of York council.
They are elected to operate the City of York on our behalf, not to go off on some fashionable tangent.
If Mr Blanchard wants to change the eating habits of people then he should use it as his ticket to Westminster.
This has absolutley bugg4r-all to do with York Council!

What a way to spend our rates?

edwina, says...
5:25pm Tue 23 Jan 07

that is excatly why I moved to France. to escape petty minded timewasting councils. if you dont like it or how it is produced dont eat it . its that simple. vegetarians do it all the time.

puppy love, says...
5:25pm Tue 23 Jan 07

candian geese are very sumptious,plenty about too.
ive got a recipe book on rare foods.
id like to try doggy while spit roasting a beaver.


Geoff, says...
5:28pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
Few of you macho meat eaters would have the guts to kill the animals yourself. Thank your lucky stars for Tesco's and the little red meaningless packages that ease your consciences. Meat means suffering. Meat means Murder. Well done York Council!
Typical of a veggie. You're really saying "I don't eat meat and because of that, you can't eat meat either!"
It's no coincidence that when visiting veggies come we HAVE to provide them with veggie food, but when we visit veggies we HAVE to eat veggie food!
Don't preach, you haven't earned the right!

J, says...
5:33pm Tue 23 Jan 07

It doesn't have anything to do with York council but it has an awful lot to do with him being a member of Compassion in World Farming, something they failed to mention in the article but is quite easily found on the York council website and his own self promotion. Should he really be wasting the time and resources of the council to promote something that he clearly has a vested interest in when the majority of York residents would like him to deal with the more pressing issues, housing, jobs, transport, crime or are they too difficult?

Vegetarian, says...
5:46pm Tue 23 Jan 07

It's no coincidence that when visiting veggies come we HAVE to provide them with veggie food, but when we visit veggies we HAVE to eat veggie food!

Geoff, you should be grateful they visit - saves you killing another intelligent animal unnecessarily!

And what gave you the right to preach to me?

You are just like the rest of the ignorant carnivores who go on eating dead animals because their fathers did the same. Well it's about time you engaged your brain and worked it out for yourself. Read into in, look at the benefits and only then make the sarcastic comments.


Jacko, says...
5:54pm Tue 23 Jan 07

saves you killing another intelligent animal unnecessarily!


The only reason i eat Tuna is 'cos of all the Dolphin in it!

Geoff, says...
5:55pm Tue 23 Jan 07

There you go again Vegetarian, preaching again!
Put another record on.

steve h, says...
6:19pm Tue 23 Jan 07

i wasn t saying that blanchard is a lib-dem but he s just about as much use and as for joe belittling my comment about sports facilities etc. i d suggest that they are a sight more relevant to the residents than foie gras.i for one wouldn t miss it if i never had it again but it s my right to decide.

Louise, says...
6:31pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
what you going to do about it??????


1)Not get wound up by imbeciles
2)Refuse to eat any type of meat
3)Not get mad cow disease like Yoooooooo!
Veggies have died of mad cow disease too you know!

But on the subject of meat - I applaud the banning of this vile dish, it's time that the suffering of poultry was highlighted, all too often all we hear about is the inhumanity of the veal crate because calves are more visually appealing than hens, duck and geese. People who condemn the eating of veal are always happy to eat chicken and battery eggs.

I enjoy veal - calves are reared better, transported and slaughtered alot more humanely than any bird is.

Charlie Croaker, says...
6:39pm Tue 23 Jan 07

I bet vegetarians taste like ****. Saying that I would try one. How are they cooked?

meat is nice, says...
6:41pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Jacko wrote:
saves you killing another intelligent animal unnecessarily!
The only reason i eat Tuna is 'cos of all the Dolphin in it!
deep fried flipper,sounds yummy.

Hannibal Lecter, says...
6:44pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Charlie Croaker wrote:
I bet vegetarians taste like ****. Saying that I would try one. How are they cooked?
nah i wouldnt touch a veggie,they are so full of s hit

meat eater, says...
6:49pm Tue 23 Jan 07

As of 2006 only 200 people have died worldwide of variant CJD. How many died in Iraq this week?

I suggest we start eating war mongering politicians.

Chevalier, says...
7:11pm Tue 23 Jan 07

I suppose horse will be off the menu next?

Ricky, says...
7:41pm Tue 23 Jan 07

It's a simple move to ban the sale of foie gras as the British government deemed the production of foie gras so abhorrent that it banned the practice, unfortunately like fur the sale of the product has been allowed to continue.
In matters such as these when the plain facts point to incredible cruelty to animals, and people are unwilling to give up this practice because they take some form of dubious pleasure from suffering, then it should be stopped by other means.

divine comment, says...
9:12pm Tue 23 Jan 07

never had the stuff. Prefer crab sticks.
Anyway, has Sentamu got a view point.
Bet he has!!!

Big Jonny Sentamu, says...
9:22pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Bless you my children.
My sincere apologies for not giving my divine views sooner, alas I was having poached swan for my supper.
In answer to the above points, I can confirm that, mine and the Lord aboves view point, is one of total agreement with the belovered council.
The children should live on loaves and fishes, with the ocassional cheese straw. Amen.

Cllr Paul Blanchard, says...
9:27pm Tue 23 Jan 07

I see I have started a "robust" debate here. I have already addressed most of the previous comments re: haven't I got anything better to do, doesn't York have enough problems, mind my own business etc. So I don't propose to answer those again - those that still disagree with me are likely to continue to do so at this stage. The two unanswered questions to my mind are (1) what legal power does the council have to do this, and (2) why am I wasting the council's money. Well, (1) I would ask you to read the actual motion to Full Council which:

"resolves:
---> to instruct the Chief Executive to write to Ben Bradshaw MP, Minister of State responsible for Animal Welfare, informing him of this motion and asking for the production and sale of foie gras to be banned in the UK
---> to do as much as reasonably possible to discourage or prohibit the sale of foie gras within the authority area, whether in shops or restaurants”

So as you can see I have left it up to the local government lawyers to decide on how to best implement the spirit of the motion. The main thing is to use our full council meeting to debate - and raise awareness of – this terrible problem. Think global, but act local. It is, after all, the local democratic forum for councillors to raise issues of concern. I have the perfect right to do that whether you disagree with me or not.

As for (2) "costing the council money" - well, Full Council takes place every two months and is there to debate motions which are put forward. This is just one motion of many. Officers are salaried to advise on and implement any enacted motions, so this will not 'cost' the council any more money at all, whether agreed upon or not.

J, says...
10:39pm Tue 23 Jan 07

For those interested to read about foie gras not written by animal rights representatives have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foie_gras

Martin, says...
11:58pm Tue 23 Jan 07

Oh ****, no more foie gras and tomato sauce sandwiches.

Thomas Westgard, says...
2:18am Wed 24 Jan 07

What in God's name is my local alderman doing, interfering in York's local politics? Tell him to put down the phone and come fix my damned potholes!

gene, says...
5:15am Wed 24 Jan 07

Thank you to councillor Paul Blanchard for promoting compassion and working to stop intolerable cruelty. Animal abuse, such as the force feeding of birds to make foie gras, can not be tolerated in a society that values compassion.

Franco-File, says...
8:51am Wed 24 Jan 07

Its quite obvious that the vast majority of those who commented above, have absolutely no idea of how the geese and ducks used to produce foie gras, are actually treated.
Yet another example of letting people who have no 'knowledge' of the subject make descisions affecting the minority- remember fox hunting?

T, says...
9:31am Wed 24 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
what you going to do about it??????
1)Not get wound up by imbeciles 2)Refuse to eat any type of meat 3)Not get mad cow disease like Yoooooooo!
Hands up who's had mad cow disease, i sure havent. eating meat is natural and when the supermarkets stop selling it i will go out and kill it myself yes! Because every veggie i know looks like they are aneamic and about to snap! You probably do too! Stop trying to make people eat what you want them to, no-body cares what your opinions on the matter are because we are big enough and old enough to make our own.

rob, says...
9:50am Wed 24 Jan 07

Vegetarian wrote:
what you going to do about it??????
1)Not get wound up by imbeciles 2)Refuse to eat any type of meat 3)Not get mad cow disease like Yoooooooo!
That's your choice, but who are you to tell us what we can and can't eat?

MuscleMan, says...
10:38am Wed 24 Jan 07

T - what do you mean that every veggie is anaemic and looks like they are about to snap? - How do you explain this then -that 50% of American Olympic Atheletes are vegetarian ? - it is in fact quite easy to explain, cos they know that is a MUCH healthier diet, which gives their bodies more energy, not less, and doesn't clog their arteries with fatty deposits. - think about it, why do meat eaters get so defensive? maybe because they know they are in the wrong perhaps?

J, says...
10:53am Wed 24 Jan 07

MuscleMan wrote:
T - what do you mean that every veggie is anaemic and looks like they are about to snap? - How do you explain this then -that 50% of American Olympic Atheletes are vegetarian ? - it is in fact quite easy to explain, cos they know that is a MUCH healthier diet, which gives their bodies more energy, not less, and doesn't clog their arteries with fatty deposits. - think about it, why do meat eaters get so defensive? maybe because they know they are in the wrong perhaps?
Is it becuase they are pumped full of drugs from Balco and then during the 1988 Olympics the body governing drug testing hid the facts that over 100 atheletes should have been banned but got away with it? But thats ok as long as no animals died.

They get defensive becuase like pretty much everyone they are sick to death of being lectured on how to live their lives by the nanny state, do gooders and tree huggers.

richard, says...
12:05pm Wed 24 Jan 07

MuscleMan wrote:
T - what do you mean that every veggie is anaemic and looks like they are about to snap? - How do you explain this then -that 50% of American Olympic Atheletes are vegetarian ? - it is in fact quite easy to explain, cos they know that is a MUCH healthier diet, which gives their bodies more energy, not less, and doesn\'t clog their arteries with fatty deposits. - think about it, why do meat eaters get so defensive? maybe because they know they are in the wrong perhaps?
So wrong on so many counts. Atheletes cannot sustain muscle development and repair on a meat free diet. You could argue that there is less fat in vegtables, but there simply isn't the complex long chain protein molecules muscle needs to develop to Olympian standard. Just look at the Linda McCartney cycle team. They were all vegetarians but sadly not very competetive.

Secondly, why do vegetarians insist that their point of view is the only point of view. We as meant eaters do not give a hoot if you dont want to eat meat! No really we don't Just DO NOT try telling us we can't or shouldn't It is our right as it is yours to eat what we feel.




Nicci, says...
12:50pm Wed 24 Jan 07

Brilliant! It is sick that even after foie gras production was banned in this country that companies started importing it, hopefully this will be the beginning of the end of this cruel delicacy,

T, says...
12:55pm Wed 24 Jan 07

MuscleMan wrote:
T - what do you mean that every veggie is anaemic and looks like they are about to snap? - How do you explain this then -that 50% of American Olympic Atheletes are vegetarian ? - it is in fact quite easy to explain, cos they know that is a MUCH healthier diet, which gives their bodies more energy, not less, and doesn't clog their arteries with fatty deposits. - think about it, why do meat eaters get so defensive? maybe because they know they are in the wrong perhaps?
I never said all veggies, i said all the ones i know!i eat meat very healthily, and i also play alot of sport! The only time i become defensive about eating meat is when people like vegitarian tell me i shouldn't just like i would be defensive about any of my own decisions that people tell me are wrong.

MuscleMan, says...
1:21pm Wed 24 Jan 07

well well, 3 very defensive replies almost straight away, just proves my point sdont you think?

Muscleman, says...
1:36pm Wed 24 Jan 07

Anyone who may be skeptical about the strength, endurance and general health of people choosing a vegetarian diet might consider these vegetarian athletes:

Bill Pearl
Four-time Mr. Universe

Ridgely Abele
Winner of eight national championships in karate

Surya Bonaly
Olympic figure skating champion

Peter Burwash
Davis Cup winner and professional tennis star

Andreas Cahling
Swedish champion bodybuilder, Olympic gold medallist in the ski jump

Chris Campbell
Olympic wrestling champion

Nicky Cole
First woman to walk to the North Pole

Ruth Heidrich
Six-time Ironwoman, USA track and field Master's champion

Keith Holmes
World-champion middleweight boxer

Desmond Howard
Professional football star, Heisman trophy winner

Peter Hussing
European super heavy-weight boxing champion

Debbie Lawrence
World record holder, women's 5K racewalk

Sixto Linares
World record holder, 24-hour triathlon

Cheryl Marek and Estelle Gray
World record holders, cross-country tandem cycling

Ingra Manecki
World champion discus thrower

Bill Manetti
Power-lifting champion

Ben Matthews
U.S. Master's marathon champion

Dan Millman
World champion gymnast

Martina Navratilova
Champion tennis player

Paavo Nurmi
Long-distance runner, winner of nine Olympic medals and 20 world records

Bill Pearl
Four-time Mr. Universe

Bill Pickering
World record-holding swimmer

Stan Price
World weightlifting record holder, bench press

Murray Rose
Swimmer, winner of many Olympic gold medals and world records

Dave Scott
Six-time winner of the Ironman triathlon

Art Still
Buffalo Bills and Kansas City Chiefs MVP defensive end, Kansas City Chiefs Hall of Fame

Jane Wetzel
U.S. National marathon champion

Charlene Wong Williams
Olympic champion figure skater

T, says...
1:59pm Wed 24 Jan 07

Muscleman wrote:
Anyone who may be skeptical about the strength, endurance and general health of people choosing a vegetarian diet might consider these vegetarian athletes: Bill Pearl Four-time Mr. Universe Ridgely Abele Winner of eight national championships in karate Surya Bonaly Olympic figure skating champion Peter Burwash Davis Cup winner and professional tennis star Andreas Cahling Swedish champion bodybuilder, Olympic gold medallist in the ski jump Chris Campbell Olympic wrestling champion Nicky Cole First woman to walk to the North Pole Ruth Heidrich Six-time Ironwoman, USA track and field Master's champion Keith Holmes World-champion middleweight boxer Desmond Howard Professional football star, Heisman trophy winner Peter Hussing European super heavy-weight boxing champion Debbie Lawrence World record holder, women's 5K racewalk Sixto Linares World record holder, 24-hour triathlon Cheryl Marek and Estelle Gray World record holders, cross-country tandem cycling Ingra Manecki World champion discus thrower Bill Manetti Power-lifting champion Ben Matthews U.S. Master's marathon champion Dan Millman World champion gymnast Martina Navratilova Champion tennis player Paavo Nurmi Long-distance runner, winner of nine Olympic medals and 20 world records Bill Pearl Four-time Mr. Universe Bill Pickering World record-holding swimmer Stan Price World weightlifting record holder, bench press Murray Rose Swimmer, winner of many Olympic gold medals and world records Dave Scott Six-time winner of the Ironman triathlon Art Still Buffalo Bills and Kansas City Chiefs MVP defensive end, Kansas City Chiefs Hall of Fame Jane Wetzel U.S. National marathon champion Charlene Wong Williams Olympic champion figure skater
Hmm so this isnt defensive???????? I certainly am being defensive..of my right to choose, not because what im doing is wrong! and i already said that, you obviously didnt read the responses, just assumed. Im not telling you to eat meat, so why are you telling me not to. Oh and in response to all those names, yes lots of them are clearly veggie (& crap) but that is by no means 50% of athletes and what about the other 50% they seem to be doing just fine.

muppet, says...
3:56pm Wed 24 Jan 07

Surya Bonaly was never Olympic champion.

MAISIE, says...
3:58pm Wed 24 Jan 07

This is all publicity seeking for the foie gras eating politicos who hang out with Cllr Blanchard in Islington restaurants. Not many of you will be aware that he is supposed to be the Parliamentary Advisor to Lord Cumnock (aka war mongering George Ffoulkes) He is also on the Labour list for fast tracking bright young things and is being groomed to be a next Labour leader. He has the patronage of Hazel Blears and Alan Johnson - two more politicos who don't know how the rest of us have to live and cannot afford foie gras even if we wanted it. So Paul, be honest and stop seeking publicity. You lost my vote years ago when you refused to march against the Iraq war.

Barry Young, says...
4:06pm Wed 24 Jan 07

The council should be applauded for this initiative. any form of cruelty of this kind should be outlawed immediately, yes we meat eaters could be condemned for the killing of animals for our plates, but this kind of extreme cruelty is unacceptable and must cease.

Here We Go, says...
4:28pm Wed 24 Jan 07

MAISIE wrote:
This is all publicity seeking for the foie gras eating politicos who hang out with Cllr Blanchard in Islington restaurants. Not many of you will be aware that he is supposed to be the Parliamentary Advisor to Lord Cumnock (aka war mongering George Ffoulkes) He is also on the Labour list for fast tracking bright young things and is being groomed to be a next Labour leader. He has the patronage of Hazel Blears and Alan Johnson - two more politicos who don't know how the rest of us have to live and cannot afford foie gras even if we wanted it. So Paul, be honest and stop seeking publicity. You lost my vote years ago when you refused to march against the Iraq war.
ISLINGTON! Blimey! Have you got the right bloke?! Last time I met him it was in a normal, average pub in Yorkshire. And the next Labour Leader!! God, the guy seems more interested in being a normal 30 something bloke & doing his job. AND, anyway, what's all that to do with his beliefs on cruelty to animals! At least he's got beliefs! And .....(again!) I can't stand this government, Blair or any of them, hate the lot & the War in Iraq, so no point in trying to say I'm a crony! Try treating people as individuals! Paul seems OK to me.

J, says...
4:29pm Wed 24 Jan 07

Which independent research says it is cruel? The research from the EU did not come to that conclusion.

Observer, says...
5:02pm Wed 24 Jan 07

So why no call to ban halal meet?

Ah yes, that's right, we can't go upsetting them can we, that'd be racist.

bean flicker, says...
5:09pm Wed 24 Jan 07

I see the above post states that Martina Navratilova is a vege.
What utter tripe.
Everyones knows that she enjoys nothing better than munching on beef..curtains.

johnny, says...
5:40pm Wed 24 Jan 07

puppy love wrote:
candian geese are very sumptious,plenty about too. ive got a recipe book on rare foods. id like to try doggy while spit roasting a beaver.
I prefer my beaver pink!

ron dyson, says...
7:57pm Wed 24 Jan 07

Congratulation to Cllr Blanchard It is more than refreshing to hear of a local authority Councillor showing concern for animals and the diabolical treatment we dish out to them. His actioin will fetch world wide acclaim and he will be wished every success in his endeavours to banish this disgusting item from the City of York menu.

v. knighton, says...
10:39pm Wed 24 Jan 07




Councillor Paul Blanchard is rather presumptuous to think he can impose his choice of menus on our local restaurants. If he doesn’t like the idea of foie gras, he can abstain, but what authority does he have to stop others enjoying it? Such moral condescention is despicable as well as ill-informed.
In my native France– unlike perhaps in other countries - foie gras production and animal husbandry are strictly regulated and controlled; the small artisan producers of South-West France scrupulously adhere to these requirements and have great respect for their animals and immense pride in the quality of the finished product.
Cllr. Blanchard should take a trip to South-West France and visit a few producers to gain an understanding of what foie gras production really entails and see for himself how it is done.
Perhaps then, instead of wanting to ban restaurateurs from selling foie gras, he might demand they ensure the foie gras on their menus is of the utmost quality and has a clear traceability back to the producer. This way, he can be sure to avoid the evils on which he built his ridiculous campaign.
And if the Councillor decides to go ahead with his crusade, surely his ban should extend to fruit and vegetables from labour-exploiting farms in african countries, intensively-produced poultry and nearly-extinguished fish?
Véronique Knighton
York.


Spen, says...
12:46am Thu 25 Jan 07

Sarah wrote:
By bringing this cruel practice to the public's attention, York Council is giving people the choice to do the right thing. Cruelty like this goes unchallenged too often in modern society!
York Council is giving people the choice No, york Council are preventing people having choice

Laura Louzader, says...
1:47am Thu 25 Jan 07

Dear Residents of York,

I'm a resident of Chicago and I live in the 49th Ward, represented by Alderman Joe Moore. I understand that our AlderMooron has recently visited your part of the world in order to promote a ban on fois gras, as though he had nothing better to concern himself with, like the ongoing problems with crime, slumlords, and lack of economic development in his ward.

Mr. Moore has made this his pet issue, I believe, because he has so little to his credit in any other area, except, of course, his efforts to make Chicago even more hostile to business than it already is by his 'big box' ordinance that would have forced 'big box' retailers to pay a minimum wage substantially higher than other businesses in the city, and than anyone in the suburbs.

The Mooron has, in the 16 years he has held his office, failed to curb slumlords, make the area attractive to the kind of retail we want, failed to respond to residents' complaints about crime, gangs, and drug dealing, and moreover has rubberstamped every TIF boondogle that will take money from necessary services to deliver it to well-connected private developers and corporations.

The fois gras issue is Moore's ticket to the 'big time', he believes, because it wins approval from celebrities like Paul McCartney, and is an easy 'feel good'.

It would be more to his credit if he were to take a reasoned stand against the unspeakable cruelty of agribusiness and the meatpacking industry in general, but Moore, like all bullies, is a coward and would rather take on a small industry and a food hardly anyone eats than take on the powerful agribusiness lobby or meat-packing industry. Yet, you cannot take a stand against animal cruelty without taking on these, as well as the dairy industry.

The fois gras ban has only made that food the most popular food in Chicago, where the new law is widely flouted. Just what we needed-another unenforceable law governing very private behavior, in a major American city rife with violent crime, and which has many other more pressing issues to deal with.

All you will accomplish with a ban on a particular food item is to make another unenforceable law, which engenders contempt for the law and creates lawlessness and disorder.

You shouldn't even let your own city council tell you what to eat and you should for the love of the gods not let a failing small-time American politician whose constituents roundly despise dictate your eating habits and morals.

Shane, says...
10:02am Thu 25 Jan 07

Thanks Laura Louzader you have just helped me to make my mind up, if Americans like this are against the ban, then it must be a good idea, I think that it is time for us to be civilised ad proud to live in a City that has principles and can make a stand against cruelty.

J, says...
10:42am Thu 25 Jan 07

The fact is there is nothing they can do at a local level and Blanchard knows there is nothing he can do other than right a letter. He could have done that without wasting council time and without the pathetic attempt of self promotion in the papers.

Another typical wannabe politician taking a shot at some thing which is easy target as the majority of the population don't understand gavage but can respond the to pictures of little fluffy ducks with a pipe in their throat.

If he wanted to do something that would make a real difference to animal welfare. How about the sale of broiler chickens in supermarkets. Go for it Paul. I will support a motion which calls for York to ban the sale of broiler birds in York. What not got the balls to take on the likes of the big four supermarkets and numerous local suppliers but can target probably less than a dozen small independent businesses . What a huge difference you will make and how brave you are.


D, says...
3:14pm Thu 25 Jan 07

As a foie gras importer I would strongly suggest to all those who believe that the process of making foie gras is cruel to make a visit to a foie gras farm in France. One thing to know is that if an animal gets ditressed then it will release adrenaline into its system. This has the drawback of making the animal inedible to humans; consequentially you could say that if the product is edible then the animal feels as if it has not suffered in that it has not produced adrenaline. Also, please believe me in that I can confirm that the birds are NOT force-fed until their livers "burst". Yes they are engorged but not burst.
Anyway, not being a Yorkist I cannot comment on the state of the city but this does appear to be a minor problem for a city official to concentrate on.

reader, says...
4:40pm Thu 25 Jan 07

For some excellent trend analysis and thought, see "Foie Gras War: From York to China?" on Super Chef :
http://superchefblog.com/2007/01/foie-gras-war-from-york-to-china.html

Magda Szyffer, says...
1:52am Fri 26 Jan 07

I continue to support the ban on foi gras and continue to support an end to all animal testing and I hope that the continued torture of animals for food, sport and experiments will forever cease.

Christopher of California, says...
2:24am Fri 26 Jan 07

Cruelty against defenseless sentient beings is just plain wrong.

York, if you succeed in banning this, you will set a brilliant example for the rest of the world.

I certainly hope you do!


Laura Louzader, says...
5:15am Fri 26 Jan 07

If you are opposed to cruelty, ban all meat and dairy products.

I could support such a ban. We really don't need to eat meat or dairy products to be healthy, and the conditions under which all animals raised for food are kept are barbaric in the extreme.

I am personally committed to the vegan lifestyle, as it is not only kinder, but consumes much less energy and is altogether easier on the environment.

However, the 'feel good' crowd will go for the fois gras ban while continuing to eat their beef and chicken. It's so much easier to ease your conscience by making a law binding upon other people that will in no way discommode you.

I find the hypocracy of it insufferable, especially since it in no way mitigates the brutalality of agribusiness on the whole.




Alex Robinsn, says...
12:38am Sun 28 Jan 07

Why don't they ban Aspartame. Far worse to mankind than some over fed goose liver.
Check out EDM 1517, look at www.sweetpoison.com and do a search on the internet for dangerous e numbers (e951). That's more helpful than this french stuff.

Huge Heffer, says...
12:05pm Sun 28 Jan 07

Alex Robinsn wrote:
Why don't they ban Aspartame. Far worse to mankind than some over fed goose liver.
Check out EDM 1517, look at www.sweetpoison.com and do a search on the internet for dangerous e numbers (e951). That's more helpful than this french stuff.
Hit the nail on the head there, Alex. Perhaps if they spent more time looking at what does more damage to us, rather than interfering with the way the French do things, we would all be a lot healthier.
I have looked into Aspartame poisoning, it is by far the most evil substance in the food chain.
For a city like York to lose a Sugar Factory and all those associated jobs, it is about time the residents looked into what the food industry is using instead of sugar and WHY. The aspartame industry is full of corruption. I did a search for 'Aspartame' & '92' and was horrified, try it!

Huge.

J, says...
5:03pm Mon 29 Jan 07

Soy is the big problem. Do a search on Soy poisoning. Not quite the veggie wonder food people think.

Comments are closed on this article.




Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »