News RSS Feed


Villagers raising £60,000 in phone mast row as talks ‘stall’

8:00am Saturday 14th April 2007

comment Comments (5)   Have your say »


VILLAGE campaigners say they have stumped up enough cash to remove an offending phone mast - but have reached a stalemate in talks with the operator.

Residents in Sheriff Hutton, between York and Malton, have protested fiercely against a 15-metre Orange phone mast ever since it was put up in their village.

After a year of meetings with Ryedale District Council - which did not complain against the mast in time to stop it being put up - local campaigners have taken matters into their own hands.

Through remortgaging their homes and asking for loans, a group of local families have managed to get a total of £60,000 together.

This is the amount operator Orange says it will cost to remove the mast, which has not yet been switched on.

But campaigner John Botting said residents had now reached a "brick wall", after none of their attempts to contact Orange had met with any response.

He said: "As a village, we have been talking to various people. We're talking about various projects between us - remortgaging houses and getting loans - we reckon that there or thereabouts we can muster the £60,000.

"We're continuing to write to them, continuing to phone - they're hoping we're just going to go away.

"That's not going to happen. There must be an alternative site to the one where it's currently situated.

"It's driven us to the point of despair - any day these people could just turn up and turn this mast on.

"That's absolutely diabolical.

"We've been completely (divorced) from any negotiations about this phone mast."

He said villagers were concerned about possible health risks in relation to phone masts, which had neither been proved nor disproved.

Martin Grey, the government and community relations manager for Orange, said: "In seeking to provide next generation mobile broadband coverage to the surrounding area, Orange established a radio base station site at Daskett Hill, Sheriff Hutton, in October 2005.

"Direct action by a limited number of residents has to date prevented the completion of works to allow the site to operate.

"In seeking to respond to local concern and reserving our rights to proceed, representatives of Orange have previously met with both Ryedale District Council and representatives of the mast action group.

"Despite attempts to allay concerns, the group has reiterated its intention to initiate further direct action to prevent connection of power to the long established site.

"Having conducted a review of siting options, Orange maintains that the base station is located suitably when set against national planning guidance.

"As such, it remains our intention to take forward plans to connect power to the long-established site and provide network coverage to the local area." He said correspondence about this had been received, and would be responded to "in due course".


Your Say YourYork Press

Richard Gowland, says...
8:07am Sat 14 Apr 07

The comment facility on news and sports stories was suspended some weeks ago because on occasions it was being abused. We have now reinstated it on all items and hope you will respect the chance to express your views and opinions without the need to be offensive, racist or defamatory to others. Have your say by all means, but keep it within the spirit of reasonable debate on a family newspaper website.

BobbyRay, York says...
9:34am Sat 14 Apr 07

Maybe it's time to take a big bite out the reality sandwich here. When it comes to applications from supermarkets and mobile phone companies, the planning system is run by THEM for THEIR benefit not by the local council for OUR benefit. If you don't beleive m, look at the number of planning appeals that Tescos, Vodaphone, Orange etc win every year.

In our oh-so-sophisticated post political democracy, it's money that talks - not the poor mugs that live here.

PS I don't have a mobile and I don't use places like Tescos!

W, York says...
9:53am Sat 14 Apr 07

However, most people who do complain DO have a mobile & DO use supermarkets.
If people want mobile phones they do need masts as people do complain when they can't get a signal.

C atherine, Sheriff Hutton says...
9:27am Sun 15 Apr 07

Sheriff Hutton's residents are worried about the effect this will have on their children. All the guidelines recommend a precauitionary approach around children.There is a world of difference between having a mobile phone that can be switched off around children and a mast that will be emitting electromagnetic radiation directly into their bedrooms and school 24/7. There are plenty of alternative sites around here that would give mobile phone users their signal without jeapordising our children's health.Before any one has the gall to post that the radiaition isn't dangerous, do a little research and you'll soon see that this is a health crisis waiting to happen.

Anon, Haxby says...
12:20am Mon 16 Apr 07

My nextdoor neighbour has a pylon in the garden, a larger pylon in the field next door and that one has a mobile phone mast on top. We protested about them all being switched on after the companies found "loopholds" in the law but our protests fell on deaf ears.
We were told that these pylons would be removed 25 years ago when the houses had just been built but alas they are still standing and now have been switched back on alongside the mobile phone mast on top. Our houses are directly in the shadow of them and nor the council or the paper had any conern for our plight. I think it is a case of the outskirts will always lose out. You won't get round Orange folks, big companys will always find a way to defeat you.

Yes most people have mobile phones but DO MOST people have pylons and mobile phone masts towering direcly over their house or even in their garden?! I Think Not !

Comments are closed on this article.




Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »