News RSS Feed


Mast fight for Commons

8:27am Sunday 23rd December 2007

comment Comments (5)   Have your say »


VILLAGERS battling to get a mobile phone mast removed from a North Yorkshire village will have their case raised in Parliament.

Ryedale's Tory MP John Greenway has written to villagers in Sheriff Hutton telling them he will be speaking to the House of Commons in January about a controversial phone mast in the village.

Residents campaigning against the mast have welcomed Mr Greenway's intervention.

Catherine Botting, who lives near the mast, said: "Mr Greenway has told us he will raise our case for us in January and I am absolutely delighted. Since the mast was vandalised it seems to have made Orange more determined not to talk to us when all we want is to negotiate, so hopefully this might get things moving again."

The move is the latest twist in a long-running saga involving this mast.

In November, The Press reported that vandals had attacked and poured concrete into the workings of the 15ft mast.

Mrs Botting's husband, John, said at the time: "It looks as if it's been damaged beyond repair and as far as I'm concerned it's a situation where it means the mast is redundant.

"I don't want to condone it, but I'm happy."

Back in June, The Press reported that a group of 100 villagers had taken tents and banners to the mast.

At that point the mast, which had been there for well over a year, had not been switched on.

Villagers have mounted a fierce protest campaign calling for its removal for over a year now. They even pledged enough cash between them - some £60,000 - to have it removed.

Last year, officials from Ryedale District Council failed to lodge a protest within the allotted timescale - which meant Orange had the right to put it up anyway.

Villagers have objected to the mast on health grounds.

But Martin Grey, government and community relations manager for Orange, said an independent review had concluded there was no "convincing scientific evidence" that signals from mobile phone base stations caused adverse ill health effects.

He said the company still intended to connect power to the mast, in order to provide network coverage in the area.

No one from Orange was available to comment on Mr Greenway's intervention.


Your Say YourYork Press

ath, York says...
9:14am Sun 23 Dec 07

The only reasonable justification for the residents of Sheriff Hutton not being labelled NIMBYs is if no-one there uses a mobile phone. If they do use mobile phones, then where should the masts be sited. In someone else's back yard, of course!!!

Captain Jack Sparrow, Strensall says...
10:22am Sun 23 Dec 07

Simply bolt the offending mast to what's left of the castle. The modern fusion of old and broken and the current with metal is sure to win the Turner prize. To be sure of the srts title, simply have some pillock in a bear suit walk around in the castle.

Nimby, York says...
12:07pm Sun 23 Dec 07

How can you object to a mast on health grounds when it is not switched on? Surely it is merely a pole at present.

bjb, York says...
6:25pm Sun 23 Dec 07

There is no justification for vandalising someone's property, particularly when it has a legal right to be there. If they has a grievance, surely it is with Ryedale council.

If the residents of Sherrif Hutton were so against it, it is they that are at fault for not ensuring Ryedale council lodged an objection in time. Most of the residents will have a mobile phone of there own that works via a mast in someone else's back yard.

Orange should stick to there guns and get a working mast in place as soon as possible.

andyb, york says...
12:03am Mon 24 Dec 07

"Since the mast was vandalised it seems to have made Orange more determined not to talk to us"

How odd. You would think they would be begging for forgiveness for putting it up.

Comments are closed on this article.




Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »