News RSS Feed


Council opposes eco-town

10:03am Tuesday 22nd January 2008

comment Comments (10)   Have your say »


PLANS to build a massive eco-town on green belt land just outside York are set to be formally opposed by city councillors.

At a meeting next week, City of York councillors will be asked to support a motion criticising the Clifton Gate scheme, and voicing disappointment at the way the project was brought forward.

Developers Hallam Land Management and Commercial Estates Group want to build 5,500 homes on land immediately north of the A1237 outer ring road at Clifton Moor, in a move that has angered council leaders.

They say York cannot cope with such a major development on its doorstep, and are unhappy that the plans were submitted to the Government, without the council being consulted.

In a motion to next week's full council meeting, local Conservative councillor Joe Watt states: "There are severe infrastructure problems in the vicinity of the proposed site, which will be made worse should the development proceed.

"Moreover, there are major traffic congestion problems on the major roads feeding the site and the council does not consider that the measures for transportation links proposed for Clifton Gate will ease the congestion.

"Furthermore, the council is disappointed that the Government selected the Clifton Gate site in concurrence with potential developers without consulting City of York Council."

The motion goes on to call on the council's chief executive, Bill McCarthy, to write to the Minister for Communities and Local government and the Minister for Yorkshire to formally object to the selection of Clifton Gate as a potential eco-town.

At the meeting next week, Richard Moore, a councillor for Skelton, Rawcliffe and Clifton Without, will present a petition opposing the plans.

The developers have said Clifton Gate would be an exciting development, and promised to dual part of the outer ring road if the scheme got the go-ahead.

In their submission to the Government, the firms wrote: "Clifton Gate represents a unique and exceptional opportunity to create a high quality residential-led mixed use development."

They said the 345-hectare development would become "an exemplar of good environmentally-friendly design and sustainability and one that we believe would achieve an international reputation in keeping with that of York itself."


Charity owns site

PART of the site of a proposed eco-town on York's outskirts is owned a local housing foundation, The Press has learned.

The Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust bought land off Wigginton Road in 1998 - nine years before the controversial eco-town plans were drawn up.

As previously reported in The Press, developers want to build 5,500 homes on green belt land immediately north of the A1237 at Clifton Moor.

The site covers some 345 hectares, between Shipton Road and Wigginton Road. Developers Hallam Land Management and Commercial Estates Group say about three-quarters of the land is held by two parties, and it is they who are the main driving forces behind the plans.

But The Press has learned the other eight landowners includes the Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust, a registered charity and social landlord.

It purchased a patch of land next to Wigginton Cottage farm in 1998.

A spokeswoman said today: "Based on what we understand are the boundaries of the site, we do own a small piece of land within it.

"We have not been contacted by the developers, but do not find that surprising at this early stage."

The developers have said they would pay for part of the A1237 to be dualled if the eco-town got the go-ahead, but city leaders said it was not a price worth paying.


Your Say YourYork Press

Trev;, Canada says...
11:22am Tue 22 Jan 08

More houses more council tax.York City Council cannot see the advantages of development to bring in more revenue or did they not get taken out for lunch?.

Bully1, Selby says...
12:30pm Tue 22 Jan 08

Isn't it brilliant that an "Eco Town" will rely on road transport! Joined up thinking (not!).

Stephen, York says...
12:36pm Tue 22 Jan 08

"The developers have said they would pay for part of the A1237 to be dualled if the eco-town got the go-ahead"

Dualing between 2 roundabouts is also a bit of a poor offer too. Is that for people who buy a flat on the ECO-Town can get to Tescos faster but only between 9pm and 7am that is.

Peter, york says...
12:43pm Tue 22 Jan 08

I bet if CYC owned the land they would be all for it AKA Derwenthorpe etc

Angry and Frustrated, York says...
1:03pm Tue 22 Jan 08

For once I find myself agreeing with the current council leaders. York's infrastructure can barely cope as it is - the public transport is shocking and expensive, the roads are heavily congested, council services etc are dwindling. On what planet do the instigators of this scheme live?

Lets be honest here. The developers are in it for one thing and one thing only - profit and huge amounts of it. They don't want to build an "eco-town" as it takes too much off their margins. They have only offered to do it because that is the only way they stand a chance of getting permission to build on green belt land.

I am no fan of Galloway and his chronies but at least they live here and experience the same shocking congestion etc that we do. Do we really want a faceless beaurocrat in London dictating what can and can't be built on our doorstep? The chances are, the "desicion maker" may not even have visited York, let alone taken a trip round the A1237 during rush hour. The existing residents already have to queue for ages to get into town in the morning - add onto that another 5000 homes - CHAOS!! They may offer to dual the ring road, but they can't dual the main routes into York such as the A19, Huntington Road, Haxby Road etc.

And will the Press please STOP calling it an "eco-town". That suggests it will be a seperate entity away from York. In reality, what is being proposed is an "eco-suburb" of York which could decimate the character of our ancient town. Based on what I have read, suburbs and villages like Haxby and Wigginton will be nearer to this "eco-town" than York - I presume that they will no longer be considered as part of York if the development goes ahead!!

Student, says...
3:09pm Tue 22 Jan 08

Angry and Frustrated wrote:
For once I find myself agreeing with the current council leaders. York's infrastructure can barely cope as it is - the public transport is shocking and expensive, the roads are heavily congested, council services etc are dwindling. On what planet do the instigators of this scheme live?

Lets be honest here. The developers are in it for one thing and one thing only - profit and huge amounts of it. They don't want to build an "eco-town" as it takes too much off their margins. They have only offered to do it because that is the only way they stand a chance of getting permission to build on green belt land.

I am no fan of Galloway and his chronies but at least they live here and experience the same shocking congestion etc that we do. Do we really want a faceless beaurocrat in London dictating what can and can't be built on our doorstep? The chances are, the "desicion maker" may not even have visited York, let alone taken a trip round the A1237 during rush hour. The existing residents already have to queue for ages to get into town in the morning - add onto that another 5000 homes - CHAOS!! They may offer to dual the ring road, but they can't dual the main routes into York such as the A19, Huntington Road, Haxby Road etc.

And will the Press please STOP calling it an "eco-town". That suggests it will be a seperate entity away from York. In reality, what is being proposed is an "eco-suburb" of York which could decimate the character of our ancient town. Based on what I have read, suburbs and villages like Haxby and Wigginton will be nearer to this "eco-town" than York - I presume that they will no longer be considered as part of York if the development goes ahead!!
Completely agreed. I hardly ever agree with the council but on this occasion they have my full support. I live in Rawcliffe and the traffic situation is already bad enough, without such a large development going ahead.

Peter, I don't think that this would have the support of the council if they owned the land, simply because the scheme is too big. To almost double the number of houses in an area is stupid, especially if the current infrastructure cannot already cope.

opinionated, Haxby says...
5:11pm Tue 22 Jan 08

The planners will probably make their own decision anyway, someone I know recently objected to a development, as did several neighbours. The parish council supported the objections and didn't approve the build, only for council to pass it. Why? Who knows! Though getting back to the issue in hand, fair play council this is the only viable outcome.

the Butler, Cowichan Bay B.C Canada says...
6:03pm Tue 22 Jan 08

Taking arable land and paving it over has always been a developers dream come true, Flat land,No rocks to blast, = money for old rope.
These lands are a priceless part of society's needs for the future.When will a reality check be taken,Also a modicum of common sense used?.

Franky, York says...
6:41pm Tue 22 Jan 08

So does this not need the approval of Council, since the developers/landowner
s went straight to central government?

magicman!, says...
12:41am Thu 24 Jan 08

I really don't get this council... First they say more homes are needed for the city. Next they decide to cut back on services for elderly, children and disabled to save money. next they decide to give themselves a huge pay rise for doing a poor job. AND THEN they say york cannot cope with these extra houses!!!
The developers will be paying towards dualling the A1237 which will bring HUGE economic benefit to the city, as traffic will actually be able to move along there for once. AND these 5000 extra homes will mean 5000x more council tax incomes to the council pot, and so there would be no need to make these cutbacks in services.
Are York's councillors dumb, stupid, arrogant, ignorant, self-serving, or all of these??

Comments are closed on this article.




Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »