News RSS Feed


York’s empty homes appeal

2:22pm Wednesday 23rd January 2008

comment Comments (22)   Have your say »


MORE action should be taken to bring empty properties in York back into use, a city councillor has claimed.

Council records show there are more than 500 properties in York that have been empty for at least six months.

Coun Tracey Simpson-Laing says housing officers should use new laws that allow them to take control of disused dwellings, to help tackle York's housing shortage.

She has tabled a motion to this week's full meeting of City of York Council, urging the authority to use Empty Dwelling Management Orders (EDMOs), which were introduced under the Housing Act 2004.

Coun Simpson-Laing said there would be some cost in using the powers, but said: "York residents are also paying for these properties whilst they lay empty. Every time the police or fire brigade are called out as a result of vandalism we all pay."

She said: "These powers have been available for a long time now, but the council has decided not to use them. We must face the reality of the housing shortage and take whatever measures possible to reverse the trend which, at present, is getting worse. EDMOs would not be used in an inappropriate way. If properties are vacant because of a death then a reasonable length of time is left before action can be taken. A house on the market to be sold would not be subject to an EMDO. Action to place a property under an EDMO is only taken after those responsible for the property had been talked through their rights and responsibilities.

"The principle behind this is occupation of as many properties as possible, given the housing shortage. We would like to see the local housing authority use the powers as a last resort, and only after constructive dialogue with those responsible for the dwelling. This is a critically important point. People will be given every opportunity to act following officers' advice, advice that will give them ample time to take action."

EDMOs fall between voluntary action by private owners and compulsory purchase powers for local housing authorities.

The motion will be debated at tomorrow's council meeting.


Your Say YourYork Press

Franky, York says...
2:23pm Wed 23 Jan 08

Needs a photo I think...

dragon1472, york says...
2:29pm Wed 23 Jan 08

so the they want to take back the houses that people have paid for and rerent them. so will they pay the owner the rent or will they just keep it and hike the council tax go up so they can get the property. they always put up the tax and never have anything to show for it.

Jason, says...
2:35pm Wed 23 Jan 08

How many council houses are empty and how many have they sold in the last 10 years. Thieving bas***s

(A), York says...
2:44pm Wed 23 Jan 08

Screw the council - squat 'em!!!

Rust_Never_Sleeps, says...
2:54pm Wed 23 Jan 08

Just as I said months ago. More than enough empty homes available to render profiteering schemes like Disasterthorpe completely unjustifiable.

Well said Cllr. Simpson-Laing!

Diogenes, Here and there says...
3:13pm Wed 23 Jan 08

What an enlightened idea!
I am 100% in favour of it.
Why not start with the Guildhall. It is empty most of the time or filled with only hot air!

exp(a)t, Netherlands says...
3:28pm Wed 23 Jan 08

If they can't work it out why not squat them. Housing empty - people without houses. Put them together.

Should make it like here. If the owner is so careless as to forget they have a building empty for a year and not do anything with it you can squat it. The owner can't get you out unless they prove they are going to use the building properly.

---
When housing has become a luxury. Squatting is a right and basic need.

Miss Amelia Rate, YORK says...
3:37pm Wed 23 Jan 08

There is a lovely house on Heslington Lane which has to my knowledge been empty for 9 years. I don't see why the council can't dp a compulsory purchase order on such properties

akuma, York says...
3:41pm Wed 23 Jan 08

dp a compulsory purchase order on such properties


DP
a compulsory purchase order?

What sites have you been looking at??? LOL

Miss Amelia Rate, YORK says...
3:54pm Wed 23 Jan 08

slip of the fingers, "do"

ouserower, york says...
4:14pm Wed 23 Jan 08

There are 800,000 empty council houses in this country. There are also many buy to let landlords who sit o empty homes paying less rates than they should do. The councils should charge 150% rates for empty homes which remain empty after 1 month or are occupied for only 3 months a year.

slornie, Birmingham/York says...
4:30pm Wed 23 Jan 08

I somewhat agree with you, ouserower.

I think that the owner of any residential property that is occupied for less than 6 months of the year should have to pay double council tax, in order to make up for the loss to the local economy (no residents = no one using local shops/services). This includes holiday homes, second homes, and by-to-lets.

Nette, York says...
5:03pm Wed 23 Jan 08

Miss Amelia Rate wrote:
There is a lovely house on Heslington Lane which has to my knowledge been empty for 9 years. I don't see why the council can't dp a compulsory purchase order on such properties

I know the house well think its been empty a wee bit longer than 9 years.
Such a lot could be done with that house.
Also the old Alfreda Guest house has been empty for years now as they couldnt get planning permission for it. Its been on the house market for a year now and still no takers.

The council cant house people it has on thier housing lists, they tell 90% of them to rent privately if they can and its hard because renting privately can cost just the same as a mortgage. Some young people just cant afford to rent privately or afford a mortgage.

Gardener, York says...
5:14pm Wed 23 Jan 08

Good to see Tracy S-L despite the double barrelled tory type surname is keeping the red flag flying. Communism's slogan was 'all property is theft' so good to see it resurrected. Nationalise everything!

werdna, york says...
5:20pm Wed 23 Jan 08

I have an empty 3 bed semi south of York. It's been empty last summer. If they want to compulsory purchase they need to give me the asking price, I'm more than happy to sell it to the council I'm not fussy who I sell it to.

How many people on here would be happy to have the council put a group of homeless people in the house next door? Not many I think!

Nette, York says...
5:30pm Wed 23 Jan 08

werdna wrote:
I have an empty 3 bed semi south of York. It's been empty last summer. If they want to compulsory purchase they need to give me the asking price, I'm more than happy to sell it to the council I'm not fussy who I sell it to. How many people on here would be happy to have the council put a group of homeless people in the house next door? Not many I think!

It depends on what the homeless people are like, not all of them are horrible people doing things they shouldnt be doing.

My friends son, and his partner have been on the council house waiting list for a couple of years, they both work and have a set of twins, they were told to rent privately if they could which they cant afford. Currently they are having to live with one set of parents.

meme, york says...
5:32pm Wed 23 Jan 08

How many people on here would be happy to have the council put a group of homeless people in the house next door? Not many I think!
and thats the issue with pepperpotting affordable units in a scheme

Gardener, York says...
5:33pm Wed 23 Jan 08

werdna wrote:
I have an empty 3 bed semi south of York. It's been empty last summer. If they want to compulsory purchase they need to give me the asking price, I'm more than happy to sell it to the council I'm not fussy who I sell it to. How many people on here would be happy to have the council put a group of homeless people in the house next door? Not many I think!
I would - can't be any worse than the current neighbours, plus it would lower property values and let some first time buyers in on the market.

South A19 Crawler, Barlby says...
5:51pm Wed 23 Jan 08

All property is theft. Lets return to anarchy and reclaim the streets for the people. Western cultural capitalism has failed. Long live the revolution.

MY04fwn, York says...
8:45pm Wed 23 Jan 08

Can someone please explain why the coucils still sell off housing to their tennants when we have a social housing shortage. Is it not time to retain properties the council own to be given to others when prople move on.

Littlepoo, Washington, DC (ex pat) says...
12:53am Thu 24 Jan 08

werdna wrote:
I have an empty 3 bed semi south of York. It's been empty last summer. If they want to compulsory purchase they need to give me the asking price, I'm more than happy to sell it to the council I'm not fussy who I sell it to. How many people on here would be happy to have the council put a group of homeless people in the house next door? Not many I think!
Has it occurred to you that the reason its been empty since the summer is because you asking too much for it? Reduce the price and I'm sure someone would buy it.

On Topic, says...
6:04am Thu 24 Jan 08

This is absolutely outrageous. They can not steal someone's house and rent it out willy-nilly. If a person wants to leave their own property empty then that is their business, the council can not come along and steal it. Ridiculous! Blatant theft. If the council had not sold off most of their houses they would not be in this situation.

Comments are closed on this article.




Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »