News RSS Feed


'I could have been left in there dead for weeks'

11:44am Sunday 23rd March 2008

comment Comments (14)   Have your say »


FOUR weeks without a bath and unable even to get dressed, a vulnerable disabled man claims he was let down by York's home help service.

Tony Bailey, of Acomb, in York, was sent home from York Hospital in a taxi after undergoing day surgery to his legs that left him with bandages from his waist down.

Unable to walk, he said he did not move from his settee for ten days and it was another month before he was able to bath.

During the four months he was in bandages, the 52-year-old, who also suffers from hearing loss, reduced vision and night blindness, claims he received only one visit from City of York Council's social services' team.

He said: "I live by myself in a one-bed council flat and was in an extremely vulnerable position. I was like a mummy because of all the bandages and I couldn't do anything.

"I couldn't walk, I couldn't cook, I couldn't bath, I couldn't even change my clothes.

"If it wasn't for my friend coming to check on me, I could have been left in there dead for weeks and weeks and nobody would have known."

Mr Bailey said apart from one food package dropped off by social services about four days after his return home, he received no help and instead relied on his friend to bring him sandwiches.

His troubles began in February 2006 after a fall left him with severely damaged veins in his legs and blood clots in the groin and knees.

Unable to continue his work as a painter and decorator, Mr Bailey underwent day surgery in December 2006 to remove the veins and blood clots.

Feeling let down by social services, he lodged a complaint with City of York Council in January 2007 and following an eight-month investigation, this was partially upheld by an independent consultancy firm.

The report agreed there had been no provision of services from social services to assist with Mr Bailey's needs, but did not agree that there had been no communication from social services staff.

Mr Bailey was offered £250 in compensation from City of York Council, which he reluctantly accepted two months ago.

He said: "It cost me £450 to pay for a friend to deal with my needs while I was in that state, so £250 is no where near enough. I just hope that they've got the system sorted out now so that nobody else has to go through what I went through. That kind of treatment is appalling."

A spokesperson for City of York Council said it would not be appropriate to discuss Mr Bailey's case in any detail since it had been settled.

Have your say

What do you think about Mr Bailey's treatment?


Your Say YourYork Press

sayitasitis, YORK says...
12:02pm Sun 23 Mar 08

Had you or your friend considered picking up a telephone and asking for help?

franky, york says...
12:10pm Sun 23 Mar 08

He accepted the compensation two months ago - why is this a story in the Press now?

And some friend if they charged him 450 quid to help out! I assume the man went on benefit while he was unable to work during that time.

martin, York says...
12:11pm Sun 23 Mar 08

''Have your say

What do you think about Mr Bailey's treatment?''

Ot to put it another way. 'Please take this opportunity to have a go at the Council'.

franky, york says...
12:13pm Sun 23 Mar 08

Slow news weekend I take it!

Bemused, says...
12:17pm Sun 23 Mar 08

Had you or your friend considered picking up a telephone and asking for help?

Quite, and he's only 52.

jojo, york says...
1:19pm Sun 23 Mar 08

I think the point is that some vulnerable people may not be aware of the help that may be available and some are brought up not to ask for help. If he was unable to move from his sofa for 10 days then i would say he may not have been well enough to be organising care for himself and it would be up to the hospital to assess whether they should be organising care for a patient when they are discharged.
In this case, i think this man was let down and it`s unfair for people to be having a go at him.

franky, york says...
1:28pm Sun 23 Mar 08

Jojo, you correctly identify it's the hospital at fault, for not ensuring the right care was put in place, or giving the man the right information about how to get help if he needed.

However, that doesn't explain why the article in the Press appears two months after the case has been sorted out? The Press article makes no effort to inform others of what they can do to avoid the same situation.

Is the man running to the Press because he thinks he deserves more money than he got? If so, why? Why did it cost him 450 for the help of his "friend"? Why did he not go on benefits or seek carers payment in this situation?

Or is it just a case of the Press having a stack of these type of moaning stories on call that it can pull out whenever news is slow?

young skywalker, My chair says...
3:13pm Sun 23 Mar 08

Hmm I believe if he needed care at home as a direct result of the surgery, which would have been the case if he could not walk and was covered in bandages, then it's primarily the hospital's responsibility to prove Intermediate Care. It's not really Social Services' job to pick up cases like this. Sounds like York District has been a bit useless in this case, but of course the York Press prefer a bit of council bashing whenever the opportunity presents itself.....

ChrisYork born&bred, YORK says...
4:22pm Sun 23 Mar 08

I feel sorry for this guy,The press never give the full story about anything,giving all the facts with a story like this would give a clear picture, still reporters are not that bright at the press, My barrister told a reporter the facts of my case & she still got it wrong in the press,Hence the phrase,(dont believe all you read in the press)....

york1900, York says...
4:52pm Sun 23 Mar 08

young skywalker wrote:
Hmm I believe if he needed care at home as a direct result of the surgery, which would have been the case if he could not walk and was covered in bandages, then it's primarily the hospital's responsibility to prove Intermediate Care. It's not really Social Services' job to pick up cases like this. Sounds like York District has been a bit useless in this case, but of course the York Press prefer a bit of council bashing whenever the opportunity presents itself.....
The first thing the hospital ask you before they let you go home " is there anyone at home to look after you " and on your answer they dediced if you go home or are found a bed on a ward

Plaggy Terry, Classic Cnuts says...
9:41pm Sun 23 Mar 08

He could have foned for chinkys and kebabs,wouldnt starve then,, 450 for some sarnies frick sake, were they caviar

Cyber-Dyne systems model 101, The future says...
12:44am Mon 24 Mar 08

I have some amount of sympathy for this bloke, it cant have been nice going without any help for that length of time.

But that said, I'm sure that at any point in time he could have picked up the telephone and asked for help.

I recall when both my arms were broken, I still managed to tend to myself in terms of hygene, so I know it can be done.

york, york says...
12:20pm Mon 24 Mar 08

YDH hospital discharge forms prompt questions around looking after yourself at home and SS must have been alerted if they delieved food to him, so he would have been aware of the services avaliable to him, particularly as he was able to contact the papers to let them know how 'let down' he was. The man himself or his friend (that charges £450!?) has a tongue in his head to inform the paper, but not to ask for help.

Silver, York says...
12:42pm Mon 24 Mar 08

The council have a team for people in need for when they leave the hospital called PIT I think it's promoting independance team. So he has a point if they were meant to see him they obviously didn't do their job which isn't a surprise as the care part of the council is an absolute disgrace with the people managing the teams have an education that would shame a retarded dog

Comments are closed on this article.




Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »