News RSS Feed


MP and pensioners want chancellor to maintain fuel payments

2:14pm Friday 16th May 2008

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »


CITY of York MP Hugh Bayley is to write to the Chancellor of the Exchequer calling on him not to axe winter fuel payments for pensioners.

It comes after Mr Bayley conducted a survey of pensioners in York, asking for their views on pensions, health care and benefits.

The Government has recently increased this year's winter fuel payments to £250 for households with someone aged over 60, and to £400 for households with someone aged over 80.

However, the payment is not guaranteed for future years and could fall back to £200 and £300 in 2009 if, for example, fuel prices were to fall. Mr Bayley's study showed that 90 per cent of York pensioners think the Government should keep the higher winter payments come what may.

Mr Bayley said: "I launched a consultation with pensioners in York to find out their views about what the Labour Government is doing for older people.

"The survey raises an important question about winter fuel payments which I have taken up with the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

"The government has done a lot to help pensioners but more can and should be done.

"It is vital that older people are able to afford to keep themselves warm."

A total of 272 pensioners replied to the consultation which was sent to 1,200 individual pensioners.

Mr Bayley has now written to the Chancellor, Alistair Darling, to pass on the survey's findings and to ask him to keep the higher winter fuel payments. The survey also revealed that 86 per cent of pensioners are pleased with Labour's decision to restore the link between pensions and average earnings in 2012.

A further 88 per cent agree the Government is right to provide extra help for poorer pensioners through the pension credit.

Some 69 per cent of the respondents thought the council should do more to help pensioners with transport.

One pensioner said: "I need travel tokens I am disabled and not able to walk."


Your Say YourYork Press

BOOTLE BASHER, anfield says...
2:31pm Fri 16 May 08

Spongers.just wear 3 cardigans instead of 2.

wildthing666, york says...
2:38pm Fri 16 May 08

BOOTLE BASHER wrote:
Spongers.just wear 3 cardigans instead of 2.
More washing so more fuel used so more expense.
Just stop the payment to those who use it for a holiday or where in high enough paid jobs to be able to afford to put away large amounts to wards a pension an example every MP .

Means test it but set it high enough not to hurt those in need.

petethefeet, York says...
3:09pm Fri 16 May 08

"Just stop the payment to those who use it for a holiday or where in high enough paid jobs to be able to afford to put away large amounts to wards a pension an example every MP ."

This is the rub of the issue
Tomorrow, I'm travelling with 6 friends to the North of Scotland for a weeks walking as we have done since the seventies. Only 2 of us haven't past 60 and yet were camping and bagging munroes. All of us are still capable of running to some degree. Also, as a man, we've never been richer. So providing winter heating (or cardigans) for us is ludicrous and an insult to younger people struggling to pay todays whopping taxes. The benefits have to become 'means-tested' all the whole lot will implode.

Miss Amelia Rate, YORK says...
3:18pm Fri 16 May 08

petethefeet wrote:
"Just stop the payment to those who use it for a holiday or where in high enough paid jobs to be able to afford to put away large amounts to wards a pension an example every MP ." This is the rub of the issue Tomorrow, I'm travelling with 6 friends to the North of Scotland for a weeks walking as we have done since the seventies. Only 2 of us haven't past 60 and yet were camping and bagging munroes. All of us are still capable of running to some degree. Also, as a man, we've never been richer. So providing winter heating (or cardigans) for us is ludicrous and an insult to younger people struggling to pay todays whopping taxes. The benefits have to become 'means-tested' all the whole lot will implode.
should means test all benefits, including family allowance.

BOOTLE BASHER, anfield says...
12:20am Sat 17 May 08

More washing so more fuel used so more expense.

good point never thought of that .but old people dont wash their clothes anyway hence they smell of wee

Dr. John Sentamu, York says...
11:14pm Sat 17 May 08

BOOTLE BASHER wrote:
More washing so more fuel used so more expense.

good point never thought of that .but old people dont wash their clothes anyway hence they smell of wee
LOL @ you complaining about the stereotyping of people from Liverpool in one thread, then doing the exact same thing to the elderly in this one. Typical moronic scouse behaviour.

Comments are closed on this article.




Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »